Skip to Main Content

Public Health

Evidence Based Practice (EBP)

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is a prominent concept in the health sciences. It involves the delivery of optimal individual patient care, through the integration of, current best research evidence, and clinical expertise/knowledge. In Public Health, Evidence Based Practice involves, integrating scientifically-based research evidence, and community preferences (instead of individual patient)  for improved healthcare outcomes. As Brownson stated, it involves "the development, implementation, and evaluation of effective programs and policies in public health through utilization of principles of scientific reasoning, including systematic uses of data and information systems, and appropriate use of behavioral science theory and program planning models."

Brownson, R. C., Gurney, J. G., & Land, G. H. (1999). Evidence-based decision making in public health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice5(5), 86-97.

                 

Steps for Acquiring Evidence 

  1. Identify your research problem or hypothesis 
  2. Brainstorm and gather terminology to represent key concepts
  3. Select appropriate databases to search 
  4. Tailor the search strategy to each database
  5. Assess results and appraise studies
  6. Save searches and export results to a reference manager (e.g., Zotero or Research Matrix)

Select Databases

The following databases are ideal for finding evidence-based literature:

NREPP

SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP). NREPP was developed to help the public learn more about evidence-based interventions that are available for implementation.

Assess Results & Appraise Studies

Depending on your research question, you need to address what type of study would provide the best evidence. When searching for articles, databases often have filters allowing you to acquire specific types of studies.

Types of Studies

Systematic Review: It is an intensive review of the literature on a given topic. It uses explicit and rigorous methods to identify the studies included in the review. It also critically appraises and synthesizes all the studies included in the review. - secondary research 

Meta-Analysis: Similarly to a systematic they overview extensively the literature on a topic, but they combine the results of all the studies identified in a quantitative way. They synthesizing summaries and make a conclusion that may be used to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness. - secondary research

Randomized Controlled Trial: It is a clinical trial that involves at least one test treatment and one control treatment. There was concurrent enrollment and follows up of the test- and control-treated groups, and in which the treatments were administered by a random process.- primary research

Cohort Study: A study in which subsets of a defined population are identified and studies over a period of time to see the effects of something. - primary research 

Cross-sectional Study: A study that describes the relationship between diseases and other factors at one point in time in a defined population. They are often used for comparing diagnostic test. 

Retrospective Cohort: A study that follows the same direction of inquiry as a cohort study, but this study design uses information that has been already collected in the past and kept in files or data sets.  

Case Control Study: A study that starts with the identification of persons with a specific condition then compared with a control group who do not have the condition. The relationship of an attribute to the disease is examined by comparing often relying on medical records of and patient recall  for data collection. Documenting  the frequency or levels of the attribute in each group. These type of studies are often less reliable because showing a statistical significance is harder. - primary research

Case Series / Reports: Articles written about one patient or a series of patients with the same issue. Great for rare diseases, disorders, and drug/treatment reactions. Not the best source of evidence because it focuses on a small group of people, but sometimes it's the only source.

When searching for scientific research evidence look for:

  • Original research articles
  • Review articles featuring a quantitative synthesis of results (eg, meta-analysis)
  • Guidelines - formal practice statements that offer advice

Type of studies to consider:

  • Cross-sectional studies
  • Quasi-experimental designs
  • Time Series Analysis

Qualitive VS Quantitative

 

Qualitative Research

Uses words to describe human behaviors. It answers a wide variety of questions related to human responses to actual or potential health problems. The purpose of qualitative research is to describe, explore and explain the health-related phenomena being studied.

Quantitative Research

Uses numbers to obtain precise measurements that can later be statistically analyzed.  Many quantitative studies test hypotheses.  It follows a systematic, subjective approach to examine the relationship between variables with the primary goal being to analyze and represent that relationship mathematically through statistical analysis.  This is the type of research approach most commonly used in scientific research problems.